Arne Gotaas v. United States

Eighth Circuit

Arne Gotaas v. United States

184 F.2d 186

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 5, 1950

Docket14210

StatusPublished

This text of 184 F.2d 186 (Arne Gotaas v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arne Gotaas v. United States, 184 F.2d 186 (8th Cir. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

184 F.2d 186

Arne GOTAAS, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America.

No. 14210

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

Sept. 5, 1950.

David A. Bourgin and William J. Kraker, Virginia, Minn., for appellant.

C. U. Landrum, United States Attorney, and T. H. Wangensteen, Assistant United States Attorney, St. Paul, Minn., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from District Court docketed and dismissed, for want of diligent prosecution, on motion of appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

184 F.2d 186

Arne GOTAAS, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America.

No. 14210

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

Sept. 5, 1950.

David A. Bourgin and William J. Kraker, Virginia, Minn., for appellant.

C. U. Landrum, United States Attorney, and T. H. Wangensteen, Assistant United States Attorney, St. Paul, Minn., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from District Court docketed and dismissed, for want of diligent prosecution, on motion of appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

184 F.2d 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arne-gotaas-v-united-states-ca8-1950.