Arndt v. State
600 So. 2d 1131, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 798, 1992 WL 15905
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 31, 1992
DocketNo. 91-2633
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 600 So. 2d 1131 (Arndt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Arndt v. State, 600 So. 2d 1131, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 798, 1992 WL 15905 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
Opinion
Appellee concedes that the issue in this case is controlled by Barnes v. State, 576 So.2d 758 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). Accordingly, we reverse appellant’s habitual offender sentence and remand for resentencing. As in Barnes, we certify the following question as one of great public importance:
WHETHER SECTION 775.084(l)(a)l, FLORIDA STATUTES (SUPP.1988), WHICH DEFINES HABITUAL FELONY OFFENDERS AS THOSE WHO HAVE “PREVIOUSLY BEEN CONVICTED OF TWO OR MORE FELONIES,” REQUIRES THAT EACH OF THE FELONIES BE COMMITTED AFTER CONVICTION FOR THE IMMEDIATELY PREVIOUS OFFENSE?
REVERSED and REMANDED for resen-tencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Arndt
601 So. 2d 549 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
Gilman Yacht Sales v. First Nat. Bank
600 So. 2d 1131 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
600 So. 2d 1131, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 798, 1992 WL 15905, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arndt-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.