Arndt v. State
600 So. 2d 1131, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 798, 1992 WL 15905
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 31, 1992·No. No. 91-2633·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Appellee concedes that the issue in this case is controlled by Barnes v. State, 576 So.2d 758 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). Accordingly, we reverse appellant’s habitual offender sentence and remand for resentencing. As in Barnes, we certify the following question as one of great public importance:
WHETHER SECTION 775.084(l)(a)l, FLORIDA STATUTES (SUPP.1988), WHICH DEFINES HABITUAL FELONY OFFENDERS AS THOSE WHO HAVE “PREVIOUSLY BEEN CONVICTED OF TWO OR MORE FELONIES,” REQUIRES THAT EACH OF THE FELONIES BE COMMITTED AFTER CONVICTION FOR THE IMMEDIATELY PREVIOUS OFFENSE?
REVERSED and REMANDED for resen-tencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Arndt v. State, 600 So. 2d 1131, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 798, 1992 WL 15905 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
600 So. 2d 1131 (Arndt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Arndt
601 So. 2d 549 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
Gilman Yacht Sales v. First Nat. Bank
600 So. 2d 1131 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)