Arndt v. P & M Ltd.

Ohio Supreme Court

Arndt v. P & M Ltd.

949 N.E.2d 15, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1525

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 17, 2011

Docket2011-0842

StatusPublished

This text of 949 N.E.2d 15 (Arndt v. P & M Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arndt v. P & M Ltd., 949 N.E.2d 15, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1525 (Ohio 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Portage App. No. 2009-P-0088, 2011-Ohio-649. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right.

Upon review of the memorandum in support of jurisdiction, it is evident that Edward W. Smith has not filed a timely motion for admission pro hac vice pursuant to S.Ct.Prae.R. 1.2. Therefore, it is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that Edward W. Smith is stricken from the memorandum in support of jurisdiction for failure to comply with S.Ct.Prae.R. 1.2 and Gov.Bar R. XII(2)(A)(6)(a)-(e).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Portage App. No. 2009-P-0088, 2011-Ohio-649. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right.

Upon review of the memorandum in support of jurisdiction, it is evident that Edward W. Smith has not filed a timely motion for admission pro hac vice pursuant to S.Ct.Prae.R. 1.2. Therefore, it is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that Edward W. Smith is stricken from the memorandum in support of jurisdiction for failure to comply with S.Ct.Prae.R. 1.2 and Gov.Bar R. XII(2)(A)(6)(a)-(e).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

949 N.E.2d 15, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arndt-v-p-m-ltd-ohio-2011.