Arndt v. Merrick Shopping Center

103 A.D.2d 788, 477 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19412
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 16, 1984
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 103 A.D.2d 788 (Arndt v. Merrick Shopping Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arndt v. Merrick Shopping Center, 103 A.D.2d 788, 477 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19412 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burke, J.), dated July 18, 1983, as, upon granting his motion for reargument, adhered to its original determination denying his motion to vacate his default and to restore the action to the Trial Calendar. 11 Order reversed insofar as appealed from, as a matter of discretion, without costs or disbursements, and motion to vacate the default and restore the action to the Trial Calendar granted, on condition that plaintiff’s attorney personally pay the defendant the sum of $1,500 within 20 days after service upon him of a [789]*789copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry; in the event that condition is not complied with, then order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. H While in no way condoning plaintiff’s attorney’s neglect in seeking to restore this action to the calendar, under the circumstances of this case, plaintiff’s default should be vacated and he should be allowed to again place his case on the Trial Calendar (CPLR 2005, 3404). Such neglectful conduct does, however, warrant the imposition of an appropriate monetary sanction (Pirnak v Savino, 96 AD2d 857). Titone, J. P., Gibbons, Brown and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cruz v. Edwards
260 A.D.2d 341 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Solis v. Mary Immaculate Hospital
170 A.D.2d 665 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Friedberg v. Bay Ridge Orthopedic Associates
122 A.D.2d 194 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Roeder v. Allstate Insurance
115 A.D.2d 469 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 A.D.2d 788, 477 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arndt-v-merrick-shopping-center-nyappdiv-1984.