Arnav Industries, Inc. Retirement Trust v. Brown, Raysman, Millstein, Felder & Steiner, L. L. P.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Arnav Industries, Inc. Retirement Trust v. Brown, Raysman, Millstein, Felder & Steiner, L. L. P.

281 A.D.2d 192, 721 N.Y.S.2d 526, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2254

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 6, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 281 A.D.2d 192 (Arnav Industries, Inc. Retirement Trust v. Brown, Raysman, Millstein, Felder & Steiner, L. L. P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arnav Industries, Inc. Retirement Trust v. Brown, Raysman, Millstein, Felder & Steiner, L. L. P., 281 A.D.2d 192, 721 N.Y.S.2d 526, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2254 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J.), entered February 22, 2000, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendant’s cross-motion for sanctions brought pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 et seq., unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying sanctions (see, Parks v Leahey & Johnson, 81 NY2d 161, 165). The conduct here was not so egregious as to warrant sanctions in the circumstances of this case. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Mazzarelli, Ellerin, Wallach and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J.), entered February 22, 2000, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendant’s cross-motion for sanctions brought pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 et seq., unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying sanctions (see, Parks v Leahey & Johnson, 81 NY2d 161, 165). The conduct here was not so egregious as to warrant sanctions in the circumstances of this case. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Mazzarelli, Ellerin, Wallach and Buckley, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

281 A.D.2d 192, 721 N.Y.S.2d 526, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arnav-industries-inc-retirement-trust-v-brown-raysman-millstein-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack