Arnav Industries, Inc. Retirement Trust v. Brown, Raysman, Millstein, Felder & Steiner, L. L. P.

281 A.D.2d 192, 721 N.Y.S.2d 526, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2254
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 6, 2001·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J.), entered February 22, 2000, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendant’s cross-motion for sanctions brought pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 et seq., unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying sanctions (see, Parks v Leahey & Johnson, 81 NY2d 161, 165). The conduct here was not so egregious as to warrant sanctions in the circumstances of this case. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Mazzarelli, Ellerin, Wallach and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arnav Industries, Inc. Retirement Trust v. Brown, Raysman, Millstein, Felder & Steiner, L. L. P., 281 A.D.2d 192, 721 N.Y.S.2d 526, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2254 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

281 A.D.2d 192 (Arnav Industries, Inc. Retirement Trust v. Brown, Raysman, Millstein, Felder & Steiner, L. L. P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kim v. Dukhon
89 A.D.3d 470 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Allstate Indemnity Co. v. Fernandez
288 A.D.2d 42 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)