Arnall-Couch-Powers Co. v. Natl. Discount Co.
75 S.E. 816, 11 Ga. App. 487, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 72
Opinion
It appearing that the contract which was the basis of this suit was an entire contract, it devolved upon the defendant either to accept the contract as a whole or to rescind it as a whole. The defendant could not affirm the contract by accepting a part of the goods purchased, and rescind it in part by rejecting another portion. For this reason, the verdict in favor of the plaintiff was demanded by the evidence. Judgment affirmed,,-'.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Arnall-Couch-Powers Co. v. Natl. Discount Co., 75 S.E. 816, 11 Ga. App. 487, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 72 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).
75 S.E. 816 (Arnall-Couch-Powers Co. v. Natl. Discount Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Whitaker v. Paden
50 S.E.2d 774 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1948)
Cohen v. Arenson
116 S.E. 658 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)