Armstrong v. Wood

67 N.W. 886, 48 Neb. 897, 1896 Neb. LEXIS 172
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedJune 16, 1896
DocketNo. 6764
StatusPublished

This text of 67 N.W. 886 (Armstrong v. Wood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Armstrong v. Wood, 67 N.W. 886, 48 Neb. 897, 1896 Neb. LEXIS 172 (Neb. 1896).

Opinion

Ragan, C.

William W. Wood, an attorney at law, sued Joseph G. Armstrong in the district court of Sheridan county to recover the value of certain professional legal services rendered by the former for the latter at his request.. The case was tried to the court without a jury and resulted in a judgment in favor of Wood, and against Armstrong, for $55, to reverse which Armstrong has filed here a petition in error.

The only argument relied on here for a reversal of this judgment is that the finding of the court on which it is based is not sustained by sufficient evidence. There is [898]*898no merit whatever in this contention. The evidence abundantly sustains the finding of the court and its judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 N.W. 886, 48 Neb. 897, 1896 Neb. LEXIS 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armstrong-v-wood-neb-1896.