Armstrong v. . Weed

62 N.Y. 250, 1875 N.Y. LEXIS 497
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 8, 1875·Published

Opinion

Allen, J.

An order overruling a demurrer to a complaint, whether upon the merits or as frivolous, with leave to the defendant to answer, and upon failure to answer directing damages to be assessed by a jury upon a writ of inquiry, is not among the orders from which appeals may be taken to this court. The orders that may be reviewed by the Court of Appeals are specified in section 11 of the Code, and this class of orders is not among them. (Paddock v. Springfield F. and M. Ins. Co., 2 Ker., 591; Briggs v. Bergen, 23 N. Y., 162; Adams v. Fox, 27 id., 640 ; People v. Benedict, 47 id., 667.)

The appeal must be dismissed.

All concur.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Armstrong v. . Weed, 62 N.Y. 250, 1875 N.Y. LEXIS 497 (N.Y. 1875).

62 N.Y. 250 (Armstrong v. . Weed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Briggs v. . Bergen
23 N.Y. 162 (New York Court of Appeals, 1861)