Armstrong v. . Weed
This text of 62 N.Y. 250 (Armstrong v. . Weed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An order overruling a demurrer to a complaint, whether upon the merits or as frivolous, with leave to the defendant to answer, and upon failure to answer directing damages to be assessed by a jury upon a writ of inquiry, is not among the orders from which appeals may be taken to this court. The orders that may be reviewed by the Court of Appeals are specified in section 11 of the Code, and this class of orders is not among them. (Paddock v. Springfield F. and M. Ins. Co., 2 Ker., 591; Briggs v. Bergen, 23 N. Y., 162; Adams v. Fox, 27 id., 640 ; People v. Benedict, 47 id., 667.)
The appeal must be dismissed.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
62 N.Y. 250, 1875 N.Y. LEXIS 497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armstrong-v-weed-ny-1875.