Armstrong v. Walton

95 S.E. 1000, 22 Ga. App. 288, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 308
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 14, 1918
Docket8299
StatusPublished

This text of 95 S.E. 1000 (Armstrong v. Walton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Armstrong v. Walton, 95 S.E. 1000, 22 Ga. App. 288, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 308 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Bloodwokth, J.

Every material question raised in the motion [289]*289for a new trial in this ease was certified to the Supreme Court. The headnotes above quoted are those prepared by that court in connection with their answers to the certified questions. A full report of the opinion of the Supreme Court will be found in 147 Ga. 781 (95 S. E. 714). These answers show that no error of law was committed in the trial of the case, and as there was ample evidence to support the verdict, no error was' committed in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Armstrong v. Walton
95 S.E. 714 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 S.E. 1000, 22 Ga. App. 288, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armstrong-v-walton-gactapp-1918.