Armstrong v. Walton

95 S.E. 1000, 22 Ga. App. 288, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 308
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 14, 1918·No. 8299·Published

Opinion

Bloodwokth, J.

Every material question raised in the motion [289] for a new trial in this ease was certified to the Supreme Court. The headnotes above quoted are those prepared by that court in connection with their answers to the certified questions. A full report of the opinion of the Supreme Court will be found in 147 Ga. 781 (95 S. E. 714). These answers show that no error of law was committed in the trial of the case, and as there was ample evidence to support the verdict, no error was' committed in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Armstrong v. Walton, 95 S.E. 1000, 22 Ga. App. 288, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 308 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

95 S.E. 1000 (Armstrong v. Walton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Armstrong v. Walton
95 S.E. 714 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1918)