Home/Supreme Court/Armstrong v. U.S. Dist. Court for the E. Dist. of Pa.

Armstrong v. U.S. Dist. Court for the E. Dist. of Pa.

140 S. Ct. 292, 205 L. Ed. 2d 10
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 7, 2019
DocketNo. 19-5213
StatusPublished

This text of 140 S. Ct. 292 (Armstrong v. U.S. Dist. Court for the E. Dist. of Pa.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Armstrong v. U.S. Dist. Court for the E. Dist. of Pa., 140 S. Ct. 292, 205 L. Ed. 2d 10 (U.S. 2019).

Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals , 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (per curiam ).

Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals
506 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
140 S. Ct. 292, 205 L. Ed. 2d 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armstrong-v-us-dist-court-for-the-e-dist-of-pa-scotus-2019.