Armstrong v. United States District Court
This text of 10 F. App'x 239 (Armstrong v. United States District Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In these consolidated appeals, Arthur O. Armstrong appeals a district court order denying his motions for leave to file complaints. We have reviewed the record and the district court order and find no revers[240]*240ible error. Accordingly, we deny Armstrong’s motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and for summary judgment and dismiss the appeals as frivolous. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 F. App'x 239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armstrong-v-united-states-district-court-ca4-2001.