Armstrong v. Taylor

22 P.2d 372, 164 Okla. 37, 1933 Okla. LEXIS 740
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided May 23, 1933·No. 22715·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause was filed herein August 13, 1931, and thereafter the brief was filed on October 12, 1931. Defendant in error filed a motion to dismiss, which was thereupon denied.

Since Unit date, on April 22, 1933, the defendant in error has filed a confession of error, and asks that the cause be reversed and remanded to the lower court for further proceedings, since the cause has never beeja fully tried in the court below, and it appears upon examination of the petition in error and the prayer thereof that the plaintiff in error seeks to have tEe cause reversed and remanded, with instructions to reinstate plaintiff in error’s answer, and that the cause proceed to trial in accordance with the statutes in such ease made and provided. The cause is, therefore, upon said application and confession of error, reversed and remanded, with directions to proceed in accordance with the prayer of the petition in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Armstrong v. Taylor, 22 P.2d 372, 164 Okla. 37, 1933 Okla. LEXIS 740 (Okla. 1933).

22 P.2d 372 (Armstrong v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Security Bank of Ponca City v. Wilson
1939 OK 458 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1939)
O'Dell v. Sharp
1938 OK 292 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1938)