Armstrong v. Taylor

Fourth Circuit

Armstrong v. Taylor

8 F. App'x 270

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 8, 2001·No. Nos. 00-2559, 00-2560·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Arthur O. Armstrong appeals district court orders denying leave to file complaints against Police Officer B.R. Taylor. We have reviewed the record and the district court orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We also deny Armstrong’s motions for summary judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before [271] the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Arthur O. Armstrong appeals district court orders denying leave to file complaints against Police Officer B.R. Taylor. We have reviewed the record and the district court orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We also deny Armstrong’s motions for summary judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before [271] the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Armstrong v. Taylor, 8 F. App'x 270 (4th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

8 F. App'x 270 (Armstrong v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.