Armstrong v. State

228 S.W. 224, 88 Tex. Crim. 506, 1921 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 292
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Armstrong v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 227 S.W. 485
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 23, 1921·No. No. 6039.·Published

Opinion

HAWKINS, Judge.

Appellant entered a plea of guilty in the District Court of Camp county under a charge for selling intoxicating liquors, and the jury upon said plea assessed his punishment at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

The appellant, without filing a motion for new trial, gave notice of appeal to this court, and entered into a recognizance, and the case is before us without a statement of facts, brief for appellant, or exceptions of any kind in the record. The indictment and the other proceedings in the case appear to be regular; no fundamental error appears from the face of the record, and in the absence of a statement of facts we must presume the evidence was sufficient to authorize a conviction, and the judgment must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Armstrong v. State, 228 S.W. 224, 88 Tex. Crim. 506, 1921 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 292 (Tex. 1921).

228 S.W. 224 (Armstrong v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.