Armstrong v. State
This text of 157 S.W. 1194 (Armstrong v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of burglary; his punishment being assessed at ten years’ confinement in the penitentiary.
The matters set forth in this transcript refer to matters of practice altogether in regard to securing statement of facts. They are presented in several ways and are decided- adversely to appellant in the case of Henry Roberts v. State, 157 S. W. 1193, this day decided. On the authority of that opinion the matters do not present reversible error. It would serve no purpose to discuss the matter further or for the writer to express his individual views in regard to these questions.
On the authority of Roberts v. State, supra, the judgment will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
157 S.W. 1194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armstrong-v-state-texcrimapp-1913.