Armstrong v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Armstrong v. State

1948 OK CR 159, 175 P. 843, 15 Okla. Crim. 200, 1918 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 48

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 16, 1918

DocketNo. A-3036.

StatusPublished

This text of 1948 OK CR 159 (Armstrong v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Armstrong v. State, 1948 OK CR 159, 175 P. 843, 15 Okla. Crim. 200, 1918 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 48 (Okla. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Hale Armstrong, was convicted in the county court of Seminole county on a charge that he did sell to one Kennedy Wise one quart of intoxicating liquor, and by the judgment of the court was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for 60 days and to pay a fine of $100. From the judgment an appeal was perfected, by filing in this court on June 7, 1917, a petition in error with case-made.

The death of plaintiff in error has been suggested by his counsel of record. It is therefore adjudged and ordered that all proceedings in this prosecution be abated by reason of the death of the plaintiff in error, and the county court of Seminole county is directed to enter its appropriate order to that effect.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Hale Armstrong, was convicted in the county court of Seminole county on a charge that he did sell to one Kennedy Wise one quart of intoxicating liquor, and by the judgment of the court was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for 60 days and to pay a fine of $100. From the judgment an appeal was perfected, by filing in this court on June 7, 1917, a petition in error with case-made.

The death of plaintiff in error has been suggested by his counsel of record. It is therefore adjudged and ordered that all proceedings in this prosecution be abated by reason of the death of the plaintiff in error, and the county court of Seminole county is directed to enter its appropriate order to that effect.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1948 OK CR 159, 175 P. 843, 15 Okla. Crim. 200, 1918 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 48, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armstrong-v-state-oklacrimapp-1918.