Armstrong v. State

562 P.2d 1129, 172 Mont. 552
Montana Supreme Court·Decided April 5, 1977·No. No. 13773·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

The application for writ of mandate by petitioner is denied on the basis that this Court has no record of any proceedings against petitioner in the justice court or district court and there is no showing of sufficient facts to enable this Court to determine whether petitioner has a meritorious claim for relief.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Armstrong v. State, 562 P.2d 1129, 172 Mont. 552 (Mo. 1977).

562 P.2d 1129 (Armstrong v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Van Haele
675 P.2d 79 (Montana Supreme Court, 1983)
State v. Close
623 P.2d 940 (Montana Supreme Court, 1981)