Armstrong v. State
23 Ind. 95
Opinion
The record shows that in this case the court had no jurisdiction, the prosecution and conviction being for a felony, and the defendant not being in custody, etc., at the time the original affidavit and information were filed against him. The information alleges, the defendant was in custody, but the record shows the falsity of the allegation.
The judgment is reversed, and warden of penitentiary will be notified to return Armstrong to the jail of Scott county, for further orders.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Armstrong v. State, 23 Ind. 95 (Ind. 1864).
23 Ind. 95 (Armstrong v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sherrod v. State
71 So. 76 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1916)
Noah v. State
72 So. 611 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1916)