Armstrong v. State
179 S.E. 406, 51 Ga. App. 8, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 515
This text of 179 S.E. 406 (Armstrong v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Armstrong v. State, 179 S.E. 406, 51 Ga. App. 8, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 515 (Ga. Ct. App. 1935).
Opinion
1. The evidence connecting the accused with the offense charged (burglary), while circumstantial, was sufficient to authorize the jury to find that it excluded every reasonable hypothesis save that of the defendant’s guilt.
2. The charge of the court was not subject to the exceptions taken.
3. The refusal to grant a new trial was not error for any reason assigned.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
179 S.E. 406, 51 Ga. App. 8, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armstrong-v-state-gactapp-1935.