Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Armstrong v. State

Armstrong v. State

68 So. 3d 391, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13815, 2011 WL 3849734
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Armstrong v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 989 So. 2d 1291 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 31, 2011·No. No. 1D11-4124·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits. See Jernigan v. State, 608 So.2d 569 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) (factually unsupported theory that a judge is prejudiced against defendants in a particular class is not legally sufficient to support disqualification).

VAN NORTWICK, MARSTILLER, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Armstrong v. State, 68 So. 3d 391, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13815, 2011 WL 3849734 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

68 So. 3d 391 (Armstrong v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jernigan v. State
608 So. 2d 569 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)