Armstrong v. State

29 So. 3d 471, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 3826, 2010 WL 1049994
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 24, 2010·No. 4D08-989·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

PER CURIAM.

This case is before us on remand from the Florida Supreme Court. On the authority of Roesch v. State, 633 So.2d 1 (Fla.1993), we affirm the trial court’s order denying the appellant’s motion that he be furnished public records at state expense.

GROSS, C.J., WARNER and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Armstrong v. State, 29 So. 3d 471, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 3826, 2010 WL 1049994 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

29 So. 3d 471 (Armstrong v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Milner v. State
196 So. 3d 569 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)