Armstrong v. Snowden

107 So. 2d 619
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 30, 1958
DocketNo. 58-417
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 107 So. 2d 619 (Armstrong v. Snowden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Armstrong v. Snowden, 107 So. 2d 619 (Fla. Ct. App. 1958).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See §§ 742.011, 742.031 and 742.10, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.; Ex parte Hayes, 25 Fla. 279, 6 So. 64; Gossett v. Ullendorff, 114 Fla. 159, 154 So. 177; Eldridge v. Eldridge, 153 Fla. 873, 16 So.2d 163; Kowalski v. Wojtkowski, 19 N.J. 247, 116 A.2d 6, 53 A.L.R.2d 556.

CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., HORTON, J., and BARNS, PAUL D., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sanders v. Yancey
122 So. 2d 202 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
107 So. 2d 619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armstrong-v-snowden-fladistctapp-1958.