Armstrong v. Snowden

107 So. 2d 619
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 30, 1958·No. No. 58-417·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See §§ 742.011, 742.031 and 742.10, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.; Ex parte Hayes, 25 Fla. 279, 6 So. 64; Gossett v. Ullendorff, 114 Fla. 159, 154 So. 177; Eldridge v. Eldridge, 153 Fla. 873, 16 So.2d 163; Kowalski v. Wojtkowski, 19 N.J. 247, 116 A.2d 6, 53 A.L.R.2d 556.

CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., HORTON, J., and BARNS, PAUL D., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Armstrong v. Snowden, 107 So. 2d 619 (Fla. Ct. App. 1958).

107 So. 2d 619 (Armstrong v. Snowden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sanders v. Yancey
122 So. 2d 202 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)