Armstrong v. Rousseau

680 S.E.2d 717, 2009 N.C. LEXIS 638, 2009 WL 2032143
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJuly 13, 2009
Docket283P09
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 680 S.E.2d 717 (Armstrong v. Rousseau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Armstrong v. Rousseau, 680 S.E.2d 717, 2009 N.C. LEXIS 638, 2009 WL 2032143 (N.C. 2009).

Opinion

680 S.E.2d 717 (2009)

Arthur O. ARMSTRONG
v.
Superior Court Trial Judge Julius A. ROUSSEAU.

No. 283P09.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 13, 2009.

Arthur O. Armstrong, Pro Se.

Julius A. Rousseau, Pro Se.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 9th of July 2009 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Guilford County:

Dismissed by order of the Court in Conference this the 13th of July 2009.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Armstrong v. Fitch
680 S.E.2d 717 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
680 S.E.2d 717, 2009 N.C. LEXIS 638, 2009 WL 2032143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armstrong-v-rousseau-nc-2009.