Armstrong v. People ex rel. Rumsey

Illinois Supreme Court

Armstrong v. People ex rel. Rumsey

74 Ill. 178

DecidedSeptember 15, 1874

StatusPublished

This text of 74 Ill. 178 (Armstrong v. People ex rel. Rumsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Armstrong v. People ex rel. Rumsey, 74 Ill. 178 (Ill. 1874).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Scholfield

delivered the opinion of the Court:

We are unable to find in the record before us, any such judgment as that from which this appeal professes to be taken. The only judgment in the record is against certain lots in the city of Chicago. The appeal is from a judgment against the if. 10£ acres of the W. ^ of the S. E. \ of the S. E. £ of sec. 13, T. 39 N. R. 13 E., which appears to be entirely different property from that described in the judgment. We are not authorized to presume it is the same, and the appeal must therefore be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Scholfield

delivered the opinion of the Court:

We are unable to find in the record before us, any such judgment as that from which this appeal professes to be taken. The only judgment in the record is against certain lots in the city of Chicago. The appeal is from a judgment against the if. 10£ acres of the W. ^ of the S. E. \ of the S. E. £ of sec. 13, T. 39 N. R. 13 E., which appears to be entirely different property from that described in the judgment. We are not authorized to presume it is the same, and the appeal must therefore be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 Ill. 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armstrong-v-people-ex-rel-rumsey-ill-1874.