Armstrong v. Pennsylvania Assigned Claims Plan
514 A.2d 947, 356 Pa. Super. 454, 1986 Pa. Super. LEXIS 12291
Opinions
This matter comes before this Court en banc on appeal from an order of the lower court granting appellees’ motion for judgment on the pleadings. Appellant asks us to decide whether an uninsured owner-operator may receive uninsured motorist benefits from an assigned claims plan insurer. In a companion case, we answered this question in the negative. We refer appellant to the case of Brown v. Travelers Insurance Company, 355 Pa.Super. 535, 513 A.2d 1051 (1986).
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Armstrong v. Pennsylvania Assigned Claims Plan, 514 A.2d 947, 356 Pa. Super. 454, 1986 Pa. Super. LEXIS 12291 (Pa. Ct. App. 1986).
514 A.2d 947 (Armstrong v. Pennsylvania Assigned Claims Plan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wilson v. Letteer
12 Pa. D. & C.4th 97 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1991)