Armstrong v. Pennsylvania Assigned Claims Plan

514 A.2d 947, 356 Pa. Super. 454, 1986 Pa. Super. LEXIS 12291
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedSeptember 19, 1986
DocketNo. 2808
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 514 A.2d 947 (Armstrong v. Pennsylvania Assigned Claims Plan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Armstrong v. Pennsylvania Assigned Claims Plan, 514 A.2d 947, 356 Pa. Super. 454, 1986 Pa. Super. LEXIS 12291 (Pa. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinions

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

This matter comes before this Court en banc on appeal from an order of the lower court granting appellees’ motion for judgment on the pleadings. Appellant asks us to decide whether an uninsured owner-operator may receive uninsured motorist benefits from an assigned claims plan insurer. In a companion case, we answered this question in the negative. We refer appellant to the case of Brown v. Travelers Insurance Company, 355 Pa.Super. 535, 513 A.2d 1051 (1986).

Order affirmed.

BROSKY, J., files dissenting opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilson v. Letteer
12 Pa. D. & C.4th 97 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
514 A.2d 947, 356 Pa. Super. 454, 1986 Pa. Super. LEXIS 12291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armstrong-v-pennsylvania-assigned-claims-plan-pasuperct-1986.