Armstrong v. Pennsylvania Assigned Claims Plan
This text of 514 A.2d 947 (Armstrong v. Pennsylvania Assigned Claims Plan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
This matter comes before this Court en banc on appeal from an order of the lower court granting appellees’ motion for judgment on the pleadings. Appellant asks us to decide whether an uninsured owner-operator may receive uninsured motorist benefits from an assigned claims plan insurer. In a companion case, we answered this question in the negative. We refer appellant to the case of Brown v. Travelers Insurance Company, 355 Pa.Super. 535, 513 A.2d 1051 (1986).
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
514 A.2d 947, 356 Pa. Super. 454, 1986 Pa. Super. LEXIS 12291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armstrong-v-pennsylvania-assigned-claims-plan-pasuperct-1986.