Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Armstrong v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

Armstrong v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

670 N.E.2d 1000, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1410, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 1562
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 16, 1996
Docket96-2037
StatusPublished

This text of 670 N.E.2d 1000 (Armstrong v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Armstrong v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 670 N.E.2d 1000, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1410, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 1562 (Ohio 1996).

Opinion

In Mandamus. On answer of respondent. Answer treated as motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
670 N.E.2d 1000, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1410, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 1562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armstrong-v-ohio-dept-of-rehab-corr-ohio-1996.