Armstrong v. Mille Lacs Tribal Police Department

63 F. App'x 970
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMay 27, 2003
DocketNos. 02-3536, 02-3556
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 63 F. App'x 970 (Armstrong v. Mille Lacs Tribal Police Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Armstrong v. Mille Lacs Tribal Police Department, 63 F. App'x 970 (8th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Jeffrey D. Armstrong and William Lawrence — d/b/a Native American Press/Ojibwe News — appeal the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having carefully reviewed the record, see Spencer v. Knapheide Truck Equip. Co., 183 F.3d 902, 904-05 (8th Cir.1999) (standard of review), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1157, 120 S.Ct. 1165, 145 L.Ed.2d 1076 (2000), we agree with the district court’s thorough analysis; and we decline to address the new arguments and allegations appellants raise, see Orr v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 297 F.3d 720, 725 (8th Cir.2002). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hester v. Redwood County
885 F. Supp. 2d 934 (D. Minnesota, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 F. App'x 970, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armstrong-v-mille-lacs-tribal-police-department-ca8-2003.