Armstrong v. Mille Lacs Tribal Police Department

63 F. App'x 970
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided May 27, 2003·No. Nos. 02-3536, 02-3556·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Jeffrey D. Armstrong and William Lawrence — d/b/a Native American Press/Ojibwe News — appeal the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having carefully reviewed the record, see Spencer v. Knapheide Truck Equip. Co., 183 F.3d 902, 904-05 (8th Cir.1999) (standard of review), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1157, 120 S.Ct. 1165, 145 L.Ed.2d 1076 (2000), we agree with the district court’s thorough analysis; and we decline to address the new arguments and allegations appellants raise, see Orr v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 297 F.3d 720, 725 (8th Cir.2002). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Armstrong v. Mille Lacs Tribal Police Department, 63 F. App'x 970 (8th Cir. 2003).

63 F. App'x 970 (Armstrong v. Mille Lacs Tribal Police Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hester v. Redwood County
885 F. Supp. 2d 934 (D. Minnesota, 2012)