Armstrong v. Mille Lacs Tribal Police Department
This text of 63 F. App'x 970 (Armstrong v. Mille Lacs Tribal Police Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In these consolidated appeals, Jeffrey D. Armstrong and William Lawrence — d/b/a Native American Press/Ojibwe News — appeal the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having carefully reviewed the record, see Spencer v. Knapheide Truck Equip. Co., 183 F.3d 902, 904-05 (8th Cir.1999) (standard of review), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1157, 120 S.Ct. 1165, 145 L.Ed.2d 1076 (2000), we agree with the district court’s thorough analysis; and we decline to address the new arguments and allegations appellants raise, see Orr v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 297 F.3d 720, 725 (8th Cir.2002). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
63 F. App'x 970, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armstrong-v-mille-lacs-tribal-police-department-ca8-2003.