Armstrong v. Koury Corp.

Fourth Circuit

Armstrong v. Koury Corp.

8 F. App'x 267

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 8, 2001

DocketNos. 00-1854, 01-1005

StatusPublished

This text of 8 F. App'x 267 (Armstrong v. Koury Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Armstrong v. Koury Corp., 8 F. App'x 267 (4th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Arthur O. Armstrong seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying leave to file a complaint and denying reconsideration of the order denying leave to file a complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we find the appeals frivolous and affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in [268]*268the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Arthur O. Armstrong seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying leave to file a complaint and denying reconsideration of the order denying leave to file a complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we find the appeals frivolous and affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in [268]*268the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 F. App'x 267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armstrong-v-koury-corp-ca4-2001.