Armstrong v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Missouri

Armstrong v. Johnson

27 Mo. 420

CourtSupreme Court of Missouri

DecidedOctober 15, 1858

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 27 Mo. 420 (Armstrong v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Armstrong v. Johnson, 27 Mo. 420 (Mo. 1858).

Pincite

Opinion

Napton, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

There is no point of law saved in this case, except the overruling by the court of the defendant’s motion for a continuance. The only ground in this motion was, that the suit was not triable at the first term, it being an action upon a note by the assignee against the makers and the assignment being denied. The judgment is affirmed with ten per cent, damages.

The other judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Napton, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

There is no point of law saved in this case, except the overruling by the court of the defendant’s motion for a continuance. The only ground in this motion was, that the suit was not triable at the first term, it being an action upon a note by the assignee against the makers and the assignment being denied. The judgment is affirmed with ten per cent, damages.

The other judges concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 Mo. 420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armstrong-v-johnson-mo-1858.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack