Armstrong v. Hudgens

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Armstrong v. Hudgens

4 Ky. Op. 683, 1872 Ky. LEXIS 144

DecidedJanuary 27, 1872

StatusPublished

This text of 4 Ky. Op. 683 (Armstrong v. Hudgens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Armstrong v. Hudgens, 4 Ky. Op. 683, 1872 Ky. LEXIS 144 (Ky. Ct. App. 1872).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Pryor :

This action was instituted to enforce the collection of a judgment. The circuit court, therefore, had no authority to render a second judgment in personam against the appellant, and to this extent the judgment appealed from must be reversed.

There is a slight error in the amount adjudged to be paid put ■of the Jacobs debt, but the error is so insignificant (being less than one dollar), that the judgment in rem will not be disturbed ■on that account.

The formal judgment is reversed and 'cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Pryor :

This action was instituted to enforce the collection of a judgment. The circuit court, therefore, had no authority to render a second judgment in personam against the appellant, and to this extent the judgment appealed from must be reversed.

There is a slight error in the amount adjudged to be paid put ■of the Jacobs debt, but the error is so insignificant (being less than one dollar), that the judgment in rem will not be disturbed ■on that account.

The formal judgment is reversed and 'cause remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Ky. Op. 683, 1872 Ky. LEXIS 144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armstrong-v-hudgens-kyctapp-1872.