Armstrong v. Henson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Armstrong v. Henson

137 S.E. 439, 139 S.C. 156, 1927 S.C. LEXIS 143

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedMarch 24, 1927

Docket12182

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 137 S.E. 439 (Armstrong v. Henson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Armstrong v. Henson, 137 S.E. 439, 139 S.C. 156, 1927 S.C. LEXIS 143 (S.C. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Blease.

After a careful reading of the record in this cause, we are convinced that the decree of Hon. Edward Mclver, deceased, Circuit Judge, was proper under all the circumstances. The decree will be reported in full.

The judgment of this Court is that all the exceptions be overruled, and that the decree of the Court of Common Pleas for Spartanburg county be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice Watts, and Messrs. Justices Cothran and Stabrer, and Mr. Acting Associate Justice Purdy concur.

Mr. Justice Cothran:

I think that the case of Schmid v. Whitten is wrong in principal and should be distinctly overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI