Armstrong v. Henson

137 S.E. 439, 139 S.C. 156, 1927 S.C. LEXIS 143
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided March 24, 1927·No. 12182·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Blease.

After a careful reading of the record in this cause, we are convinced that the decree of Hon. Edward Mclver, deceased, Circuit Judge, was proper under all the circumstances. The decree will be reported in full.

The judgment of this Court is that all the exceptions be overruled, and that the decree of the Court of Common Pleas for Spartanburg county be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice Watts, and Messrs. Justices Cothran and Stabrer, and Mr. Acting Associate Justice Purdy concur.

Mr. Justice Cothran:

I think that the case of Schmid v. Whitten is wrong in principal and should be distinctly overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Armstrong v. Henson, 137 S.E. 439, 139 S.C. 156, 1927 S.C. LEXIS 143 (S.C. 1927).

137 S.E. 439 (Armstrong v. Henson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Holly Hill Lumber Co., Inc. v. McCoy
30 S.E.2d 856 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1944)
Holly Hill Lumber Company, Inc. v. McCoy
26 S.E.2d 175 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1943)