Armstrong v. Heide
This text of 99 N.Y.S. 818 (Armstrong v. Heide) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There was no necessity for the motion upon which this order was based. The notice of appeal, in so far as it treated of [819]*819the final judgment, was effective; and it was not impaired by the effort of the appellant, without right of any kind, to embody therein the two orders, the time to appeal from which had long since expired, and as to which respondent herein, in the future progress of the appeal from the final judgment, if any is made, can easily dispose of the matter of these two orders, which are not and should not be made part of the case on appeal.
Order (99 N. Y. Supp. 817) affirmed, with costs and disbursements.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
99 N.Y.S. 818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armstrong-v-heide-nyappterm-1906.