Armstrong v. Heide

99 N.Y.S. 818
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 28, 1906·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There was no necessity for the motion upon which this order was based. The notice of appeal, in so far as it treated of [819] the final judgment, was effective; and it was not impaired by the effort of the appellant, without right of any kind, to embody therein the two orders, the time to appeal from which had long since expired, and as to which respondent herein, in the future progress of the appeal from the final judgment, if any is made, can easily dispose of the matter of these two orders, which are not and should not be made part of the case on appeal.

Order (99 N. Y. Supp. 817) affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Armstrong v. Heide, 99 N.Y.S. 818 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

99 N.Y.S. 818 (Armstrong v. Heide) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Armstrong v. Heide
49 Misc. 430 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1906)