Armstrong v. Hayward

6 Cal. 183
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1856·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by Mr. Justice Heydenfeldt.

Mr. Chief Justice Murray concurred.

A release of one joint debtor is a release of the others, but it must be a technical release under seal.

The entries on the back of the note in this case, can only operate as receipts for so much money; because the payment of part of a debt is not good to discharge the debt, even if it be agreed on.

Nor can this position be affected by the fact, that the part-payments were made before the debt was due; they were not accepted in payment of the whole debt; the entries simply disclose the intention of the holder to look to the other makers for the remainder of the money.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Armstrong v. Hayward, 6 Cal. 183 (Cal. 1856).

6 Cal. 183 (Armstrong v. Hayward) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lovetro v. Steers
234 Cal. App. 2d 461 (California Court of Appeal, 1965)
Williams v. Reed
248 P.2d 147 (California Court of Appeal, 1952)
Griffith v. Grogan
12 Cal. 317 (California Supreme Court, 1859)