Armstrong v. Green

Fourth Circuit

Armstrong v. Green

414 F. App'x 535

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 3, 2011·No. No. 11-6021·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Corey V. Armstrong, a state prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Armstrong v. Green, No. 1:08-cv-00342-WDQ, 2010 WL 5285313 (D.Md. Dec. 17, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the [536]*536materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Corey V. Armstrong, a state prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Armstrong v. Green, No. 1:08-cv-00342-WDQ, 2010 WL 5285313 (D.Md. Dec. 17, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the [536]*536materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Armstrong v. Green, 414 F. App'x 535 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

414 F. App'x 535 (Armstrong v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related