Armstrong v. Green

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: March 3, 2011
• Docket: 11-6021
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6021

COREY V. ARMSTRONG,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

KATHLEEN GREEN, Warden (E.C.I); LT. HAYWARD, (E.C.I); WISENOFF, Case Manager (E.C.I); GARY D. MAYNARD, Secretary of D.P.S.C.S.; J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Commissioner of Corrections; JOHN ROWLEY, Warden (N.B.C.I); JAMES K. HOLWAGER, Ph.D. (N.B.C.I.); RICHARD GRAHAM, Asst. Warden (N.B.C.I); LILLER, Case Manager Supervisor (N.B.C.I); DURST, Case Manager; DEFENDANTS 1-9,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:08-cv-00342-WDQ)

Submitted: February 24, 2011 Decided: March 3, 2011

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Corey V. Armstrong, Appellant Pro Se. Nichole Cherie Gatewood, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Corey V. Armstrong, a state prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Armstrong v. Green, No. 1:08-cv-00342-

WDQ (D. Md. Dec. 17, 2010). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED