Armstrong v. Foote

New York City Court

Armstrong v. Foote

11 Abb. Pr. 384

New York City Court·Decided December 15, 1860·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Culver, J.

I am satisfied, on a full review of the evidence, exceptions, and rulings in this case, that the action can be sus[387] tained in the courts of this State, though the injury was committed in the Navy Yard. The case of Moloney a. Dows (8 Abbotts' Pr., 316), can have no application to this action. The order dismissing the complaint must be set aside, with costs of former trial, and $10 costs of this motion to abide event.

Order accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Culver, J.

I am satisfied, on a full review of the evidence, exceptions, and rulings in this case, that the action can be sus[387] tained in the courts of this State, though the injury was committed in the Navy Yard. The case of Moloney a. Dows (8 Abbotts' Pr., 316), can have no application to this action. The order dismissing the complaint must be set aside, with costs of former trial, and $10 costs of this motion to abide event.

Order accordingly.

Armstrong v. Foote, 11 Abb. Pr. 384 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1860).

Pincite

11 Abb. Pr. 384 (Armstrong v. Foote) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related