Armstrong v. Flinclum

Fourth Circuit

Armstrong v. Flinclum

10 F. App'x 127

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 17, 2001

DocketNos. 01-1221, 01-1224, 01-1222, 01-1223

StatusPublished

This text of 10 F. App'x 127 (Armstrong v. Flinclum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Armstrong v. Flinclum, 10 F. App'x 127 (4th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Arthur 0. Armstrong appeals district court orders dismissing his motions for leave to file lawsuits. We have reviewed the records and the district court orders and find no error. Accordingly, we deny Armstrong’s motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeals as frivolous. We further deny Armstrong’s motions for summary judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Arthur 0. Armstrong appeals district court orders dismissing his motions for leave to file lawsuits. We have reviewed the records and the district court orders and find no error. Accordingly, we deny Armstrong’s motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeals as frivolous. We further deny Armstrong’s motions for summary judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 F. App'x 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armstrong-v-flinclum-ca4-2001.