Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Ctr. Inc.
135 S. Ct. 939, 190 L. Ed. 2d 718, 83 U.S.L.W. 3578, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 1
This text of 135 S. Ct. 939 (Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Ctr. Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Ctr. Inc., 135 S. Ct. 939, 190 L. Ed. 2d 718, 83 U.S.L.W. 3578, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 1 (U.S. 2015).
Opinion
Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiaeand for divided argument granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
135 S. Ct. 939, 190 L. Ed. 2d 718, 83 U.S.L.W. 3578, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armstrong-v-exceptional-child-ctr-inc-scotus-2015.