Armstrong v. Easley
This text of 225 F. App'x 120 (Armstrong v. Easley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Arthur 0. Armstrong appeals the district court judgment dismissing his civil rights complaint as frivolous, sanctioning him $8000 and enjoining him from filing anything in the district court without first getting leave of court. We have reviewed the record and the district court order and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See Armstrong v. Easley, No. 5:06-cv-00495-D (E.D.N.C. Dec. 12, 2006). We deny Armstrong’s motion to supplement the record. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
225 F. App'x 120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armstrong-v-easley-ca4-2007.