Armstrong v. Easley

225 F. App'x 120
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 3, 2007·No. 07-1045·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Arthur 0. Armstrong appeals the district court judgment dismissing his civil rights complaint as frivolous, sanctioning him $8000 and enjoining him from filing anything in the district court without first getting leave of court. We have reviewed the record and the district court order and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See Armstrong v. Easley, No. 5:06-cv-00495-D (E.D.N.C. Dec. 12, 2006). We deny Armstrong’s motion to supplement the record. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Armstrong v. Easley, 225 F. App'x 120 (4th Cir. 2007).

225 F. App'x 120 (Armstrong v. Easley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Armstrong v. Sumner
E.D. North Carolina, 2020