Armstrong v. Duron W. Browning & Reliance Life Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh

170 So. 839, 126 Fla. 304, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1597
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 23, 1936·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this case the appeal is from final decree adjudicating in effect that án assignment Of a life- insurance policy absolute on its face was in fact an assignment to secure repayment of money advanced by the assignee to pay premiums on the policy, and therefore, constituted a lien-on the proceeds of the policy payable at the death of 'the insured.

, The allegations of the Bill of Complaint were sufficient to.state the cause of action and, if proved, to' warrant the relief sought. .

Thre was ample legal evidence to support the .allegations of the Bill of Complaint and to constitute sound basis for the decree.

We find no reversible error and the decree appealed from is therefore affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

Ellis, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. Whitfield, C. J., and Brown and Davis, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Armstrong v. Duron W. Browning & Reliance Life Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, 170 So. 839, 126 Fla. 304, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1597 (Fla. 1936).

170 So. 839 (Armstrong v. Duron W. Browning & Reliance Life Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.