Armstrong v. City National Bank
213 N.W. 372, 115 Neb. 270, 1927 Neb. LEXIS 48
Opinion
The court has carefully considered the assignments of error and the evidence in the record. Under the evidence no conclusions could be arrived at with reason other than that there is no liability on the part of the defendant bank. The jury were fully warranted in arriving at the verdict and the errors assigned could not have been prejudicially erroneous.
The judgment of the district court is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Armstrong v. City National Bank, 213 N.W. 372, 115 Neb. 270, 1927 Neb. LEXIS 48 (Neb. 1927).
213 N.W. 372 (Armstrong v. City National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.