Armstrong v. Citizens & Southern Bank

85 S.E. 851, 143 Ga. 677, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 574
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Armstrong v. Citizens & Southern Bank. Read the opinion of the Court — 145 Ga. 861
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 8, 1915·Published

Opinion

Beck, J.

The Citizens and Southern Bank brought suit against the Irish American Bank as maker, and Patrick Armstrong- as surety, upon a certain promissory note. Armstrong filed a plea; and upon the trial of the issue made by this plea the court directed a verdict against Armstrong, who made a motion for a new trial, which was overruled at the hearing. Armstrong, being unable t'o give bond for the eventual condemnation-money as required by law, prior to suing out his bill of exceptions seeking to have the action of the court below reviewed in this court, and being doubtful of his right to file the pauper affidavit under the terms of the statute, presented his petition to the judge of the trial court for an injunction and the grant of a writ of supersede,as under the circumstances. Upon consideration of this petition the judge passed an [678]*678order denying tlie petition, and to this order the petitioner excepted. Held, that even if the judge would have been authorized, under tlie law and the facts in the record, to grant the prayers of the petition, there was no error’in refusing to do so.

July 8, 1915. Rehearing denied July 21, 1915. Petition for injunction, etc. Before Judge Hammond. Richmond superior court. March 20, 1915. P. G. O'Gorman, Pierce Brothers, and W. K. Miller, for plaintiff. Boylcm Wright, Adams & Adams, and Boylcin Wright Jr., for defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Armstrong v. Citizens & Southern Bank, 85 S.E. 851, 143 Ga. 677, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 574 (Ga. 1915).

85 S.E. 851 (Armstrong v. Citizens & Southern Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.