Armstrong v. Cato

288 S.E.2d 376, 160 Ga. App. 393, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 3126

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 16, 1981·No. 62752·Published

Opinion

Quillian, Chief Judge.

In this action on a promissory note, the defendant appeals from the grant of plaintiffs motion for summary judgment.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Court of Appeals Rule 36 (2).

Judgment affirmed.

McMurray, P. J., and Pope, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Armstrong v. Cato, 288 S.E.2d 376, 160 Ga. App. 393, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 3126 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

288 S.E.2d 376 (Armstrong v. Cato) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.