Armstrong v. Caswell

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Armstrong v. Caswell

12 R.I. Dec. 19

CourtSuperior Court of Rhode Island

DecidedJuly 21, 1934

DocketNo. 91924

StatusPublished

This text of 12 R.I. Dec. 19 (Armstrong v. Caswell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Armstrong v. Caswell, 12 R.I. Dec. 19 (R.I. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

FROST, J.

Heard on plaintiff’s motion for new trial after verdict for the defendant.

This case was tried with three other cases, numbered respectively 91912, 91913 and 91925.

Mrs. Armstrong was sitting beside her daughter, Gladys Armstrong, who was operating an automobile which struck from behind an automobile owned and operated by the defendant. Mrs. Caswell’s car was stopped at the time of the collision.

The Court thinks there was evidence from which the jury might reasonably find that the collision was due solely to the negligence of Miss Armstrong.

Motion for new trial is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FROST, J.

Heard on plaintiff’s motion for new trial after verdict for the defendant.

This case was tried with three other cases, numbered respectively 91912, 91913 and 91925.

Mrs. Armstrong was sitting beside her daughter, Gladys Armstrong, who was operating an automobile which struck from behind an automobile owned and operated by the defendant. Mrs. Caswell’s car was stopped at the time of the collision.

The Court thinks there was evidence from which the jury might reasonably find that the collision was due solely to the negligence of Miss Armstrong.

Motion for new trial is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 R.I. Dec. 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armstrong-v-caswell-risuperct-1934.