Armstrong v. . Borden's Condensed Milk Company

66 N.E. 1116, 174 N.Y. 510, 1903 N.Y. LEXIS 1368
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 6, 1903
StatusPublished

This text of 66 N.E. 1116 (Armstrong v. . Borden's Condensed Milk Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Armstrong v. . Borden's Condensed Milk Company, 66 N.E. 1116, 174 N.Y. 510, 1903 N.Y. LEXIS 1368 (N.Y. 1903).

Opinion

O’Brien, J.

This case involves the same question as the case of Kane Company v. Kinney, which we have just decided. (174 N. Y. 69.) The two cases were argued *511 together and are governed by the same legal principles. On the authority of that case the judgment of the Appellate Division must be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Paekeb, Oh. J., Babtlett, Mabtin, Yann, Cullen and Webneb, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

John P. Kane Co. v. . Kinney
66 N.E. 619 (New York Court of Appeals, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
66 N.E. 1116, 174 N.Y. 510, 1903 N.Y. LEXIS 1368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armstrong-v-bordens-condensed-milk-company-ny-1903.