Armstrong v. . Borden's Condensed Milk Company

66 N.E. 1116, 174 N.Y. 510, 1903 N.Y. LEXIS 1368
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 6, 1903·Published

Opinion

O’Brien, J.

This case involves the same question as the case of Kane Company v. Kinney, which we have just decided. (174 N. Y. 69.) The two cases were argued *511 together and are governed by the same legal principles. On the authority of that case the judgment of the Appellate Division must be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Paekeb, Oh. J., Babtlett, Mabtin, Yann, Cullen and Webneb, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Armstrong v. . Borden's Condensed Milk Company, 66 N.E. 1116, 174 N.Y. 510, 1903 N.Y. LEXIS 1368 (N.Y. 1903).

66 N.E. 1116 (Armstrong v. . Borden's Condensed Milk Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

John P. Kane Co. v. . Kinney
66 N.E. 619 (New York Court of Appeals, 1903)