Armstrong v. Bero Engineering Construction Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Armstrong v. Bero Engineering Construction Co.

259 A.D. 1111, 21 N.Y.S.2d 224, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8162

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 2, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 259 A.D. 1111 (Armstrong v. Bero Engineering Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Armstrong v. Bero Engineering Construction Co., 259 A.D. 1111, 21 N.Y.S.2d 224, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8162 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion to change the venue of the two above-entitled actions from Delaware county to Cortland county for the convenience of witnesses and to promote the ends of justice. The actions are to recover damages for injuries sustained by plaintiff Blanche Armstrong while riding in a motor vehicle on a public highway in Cortland county. The plaintiffs reside in Delaware county. The justice presiding at the Special Term in the exercise of sound discretion denied the motion for the change of the place of trial. There was no abuse of discretion and the order denying the motion should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs. Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffeman and Poster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion to change the venue of the two above-entitled actions from Delaware county to Cortland county for the convenience of witnesses and to promote the ends of justice. The actions are to recover damages for injuries sustained by plaintiff Blanche Armstrong while riding in a motor vehicle on a public highway in Cortland county. The plaintiffs reside in Delaware county. The justice presiding at the Special Term in the exercise of sound discretion denied the motion for the change of the place of trial. There was no abuse of discretion and the order denying the motion should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs. Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffeman and Poster, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D. 1111, 21 N.Y.S.2d 224, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armstrong-v-bero-engineering-construction-co-nyappdiv-1940.