Armstrong v. Berkey
99 P. 921, 23 Okla. 176, 1909 Okla. LEXIS 337
Opinion
(after stating the facts as above). The question involved in this record is identical with that in the case of Lozier, Superintendent of the State Agency, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Alexander Drug Company, Defendant in Error (No. 541, recently decided by this court), ante, p. 1, 99 Pac. 808.
Upon the authority of that case, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Armstrong v. Berkey, 99 P. 921, 23 Okla. 176, 1909 Okla. LEXIS 337 (Okla. 1909).
99 P. 921 (Armstrong v. Berkey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Initiative Petition No. 314
1980 OK 174 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1980)
Sawyer Stores, Inc. v. Mitchell
62 P.2d 342 (Montana Supreme Court, 1936)
Callahan v. Peltier
183 A. 400 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1936)
Curry v. Laffoon
88 S.W.2d 307 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1935)
Smith, Secretary of State v. State Hepburn
1910 OK 304 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1910)