Armstrong v. Beaty

1 N.C. 33
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 15, 1800
StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.C. 33 (Armstrong v. Beaty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Armstrong v. Beaty, 1 N.C. 33 (N.C. 1800).

Opinion

Johnston and Macay, Judges—

The defendant William Beatty, having been duly served with a copy of the decree made in this case, and having refused to perform that decree, we are of opinion that an attachment ought to issue to compel a performance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 N.C. 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armstrong-v-beaty-nc-1800.