Armstrong v. Bateman

Fourth Circuit

Armstrong v. Bateman

10 F. App'x 126

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 17, 2001·No. Nos. 01-1210, 01-1218, 01-1219·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Arthur O. Armstrong appeals district court orders dismissing his motions for leave to file lawsuits. We have reviewed the record and the district court orders and find no error. Accordingly, we deny Armstrong’s motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeals as frivolous. We further deny Armstrong’s motion for summary judgment filed in No. 01-1210. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before [127] the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Arthur O. Armstrong appeals district court orders dismissing his motions for leave to file lawsuits. We have reviewed the record and the district court orders and find no error. Accordingly, we deny Armstrong’s motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeals as frivolous. We further deny Armstrong’s motion for summary judgment filed in No. 01-1210. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before [127] the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Armstrong v. Bateman, 10 F. App'x 126 (4th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

10 F. App'x 126 (Armstrong v. Bateman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.