Armstrong v. Armstrong
66 A. 399, 69 N.J. Eq. 817, 3 Robb. 817, 1906 N.J. LEXIS 142
Opinion
The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the ordinary, filed in the prerogative court.
For affirmance—Ti-ie Ci-iiee-Justice, Dixon, Garrison, Port, Garretson, Pitney, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Yroom, Green, Gray—11.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Armstrong v. Armstrong, 66 A. 399, 69 N.J. Eq. 817, 3 Robb. 817, 1906 N.J. LEXIS 142 (N.J. 1906).
66 A. 399 (Armstrong v. Armstrong) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Probate of the Last Will and Testament of Anna Filo
75 A.2d 517 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)