Armstrong v. Armstrong
66 A. 399, 69 N.J. Eq. 817, 3 Robb. 817, 1906 N.J. LEXIS 142
This text of 66 A. 399 (Armstrong v. Armstrong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Armstrong v. Armstrong, 66 A. 399, 69 N.J. Eq. 817, 3 Robb. 817, 1906 N.J. LEXIS 142 (N.J. 1906).
Opinion
The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the ordinary, filed in the prerogative court.
For affirmance—Ti-ie Ci-iiee-Justice, Dixon, Garrison, Port, Garretson, Pitney, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Yroom, Green, Gray—11.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In Re Probate of the Last Will and Testament of Anna Filo
75 A.2d 517 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
66 A. 399, 69 N.J. Eq. 817, 3 Robb. 817, 1906 N.J. LEXIS 142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armstrong-v-armstrong-nj-1906.