Armstrong v. Armstrong

401 So. 2d 912, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20666
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 29, 1981·No. No. 80-87·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The former husband has filed an interlocutory appeal from an order of the trial court, striking his answer on the ground of legal insufficiency.

The order was not appealable under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130. Accordingly, we consider this as a petition for writ of certiorari and deny same on the authority of Ford Motor Co. v. Nelson, 355 So.2d 158 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978).

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORA-RI DENIED.

HERSEY and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur. BERANEK, J., concurs specially, with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Armstrong v. Armstrong, 401 So. 2d 912, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20666 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

401 So. 2d 912 (Armstrong v. Armstrong) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bashure v. Estate of Paulk
498 So. 2d 525 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)