Armstrong v. Armstrong

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Armstrong v. Armstrong

401 So. 2d 912, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20666

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 29, 1981

DocketNo. 80-87

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 401 So. 2d 912 (Armstrong v. Armstrong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Armstrong v. Armstrong, 401 So. 2d 912, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20666 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The former husband has filed an interlocutory appeal from an order of the trial court, striking his answer on the ground of legal insufficiency.

The order was not appealable under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130. Accordingly, we consider this as a petition for writ of certiorari and deny same on the authority of Ford Motor Co. v. Nelson, 355 So.2d 158 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978).

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORA-RI DENIED.

HERSEY and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur. BERANEK, J., concurs specially, with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI